Data Quality Register
About the Data Quality Rating
The reporting questionnaire asks five questions for each of these data quality dimensions:
DPI is the registered custodian agency (see glossary) of the data
The data aligns with the Data Quality Framework, including:
- Legislation
- Policies
- Information Asset Governance
- Standards
- Data Management Plans
The following governance roles and responsibilities for this asset are clearly assigned:
- Information Asset Owner (see glossary)
- Information Asset Custodian (see glossary)
- Data Steward (see glossary)
Data collection is authorised by law, regulation or agreement
The Custodial agency has no commercial interest or conflict of interest (see glossary) in the data
Data has been subject to a data assurance process (For example: Checking for errors at each stage of data collection and processing, or verifying data entry and making corrections if necessary.)
Data is revised and the revision is publicised if errors are identified
The impact of any adjustments or other changes are identified in caveats attached to asset (see glossary)
There are no known gaps in the data or if there are gaps (for example: non-responses, missing records, data not collected), they have been identified in caveats attached to asset (see glossary)
Any factors impacting validity are identified in caveats attached to asset (see glossary)
Standard concepts, classifications and metadata standards are used
Elements within the data can be meaningfully compared or combined with data from other sources
This data is generally consistent with similar or related data sources from the same discipline
The data can be analysed over time
This data is consistent with previous releases if part of a collection
A data dictionary is available to explain the meaning of data elements, their origin, format and relationships
Information is available about the sources and methods of data collection (e.g. instruments, forms, instructions).
Information is available to help users evaluate the accuracy of the data and any level of error
Information is available to explain concepts, help users correctly interpret the data and understand how it can be used
Information is available to explain ambiguous or technical terms used in the data
Data is available online with an open licence
Data is available in machine-processable, structured form (e.g. CSV format instead of an image scan of a table)
Data is available in a non-proprietary format (e.g. CSV, XML)
Data is described using open standards (e.g. RDF, SPARQL) and persistent identifiers (URIs or DOIs)
Data is linked to other data, to provide context (e.g. employee ID is linked to employee name or species name is linked to genus)
For each question: “yes” = 1 point; “no” = 0 points. Only dimensions with four or five points receive a star. The number of stars is summed to give the overall quality rating of 0-5 stars.
| Data Quality Rating | Number of Assets |
|---|---|
| No Stars 0 Stars | 3 |
| 1 Star | 1 |
| 2 Stars | 1 |
| 3 Stars | 12 |
| 4 Stars | 16 |
| 5 Stars | 35 |
| Assets with a data quality statement | 68 |
| Assets without a data quality statement | 147 |
Quality Ratings Detail
| Asset title | Asset title | Data Quality Rating | Data Quality Rating | Asset ID | Institutional Environment | Institutional Environment | Accuracy | Accuracy | Coherence | Coherence | Interpretability | Interpretability | Accessibility | Accessibility | Data quality score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-2016 Septoria tritici... | 2015-2016 Septoria tritici blotch phenotype data from adult plants and seedlings at Wagga Wagga, NSW and Hamilton, Victoria plus genomic data used for GWAS in an Australian bread wheat diversity panel published in DOI:10.3389/fpls.2022.990915 | ||||||||||||||
| 2021 Septoria tritici blotch... | 2021 Septoria tritici blotch seedling plant reactions of X5192 RILF3 population at Wagga Wagga, NSW | ||||||||||||||
| 2021-2022 Septoria tritici... | 2021-2022 Septoria tritici blotch phenotype data from adult plants at Wagga Wagga, NSW for X6077 (Summit/Sunlamb) | ||||||||||||||
| Catemai (1983-present) | Catemai (1983-present) | ||||||||||||||
| Cattle grafton (1973-2005) | Cattle grafton (1973-2005) | ||||||||||||||
| Climate Vulnerability... | Climate Vulnerability Assessment Beef Cattle Data | ||||||||||||||
| Climate Vulnerability... | Climate Vulnerability Assessment Blueberry Data | ||||||||||||||
| Climate Vulnerability... | Climate Vulnerability Assessment Bonito Data | ||||||||||||||
| Climate Vulnerability... | Climate Vulnerability Assessment Buffalo Fly Data | ||||||||||||||
| Climate Vulnerability... | Climate Vulnerability Assessment Cattle Tick Data | ||||||||||||||
| Climate Vulnerability... | Climate Vulnerability Assessment Cherry Data | ||||||||||||||
| Climate Vulnerability... | Climate Vulnerability Assessment Chickpea Data | ||||||||||||||
| Climate Vulnerability... | Climate Vulnerability Assessment Citrus Data | ||||||||||||||
| Climate Vulnerability... | Climate Vulnerability Assessment Dolphinfish Data | ||||||||||||||
| Climate Vulnerability... | Climate Vulnerability Assessment Dryland Barley Data | ||||||||||||||
| Climate Vulnerability... | Climate Vulnerability Assessment Dryland Canola Data | ||||||||||||||
| Climate Vulnerability... | Climate Vulnerability Assessment Dryland Maize Data | ||||||||||||||
| Climate Vulnerability... | Climate Vulnerability Assessment Dryland Wheat Data | ||||||||||||||
| Climate Vulnerability... | Climate Vulnerability Assessment Fusarium Data | ||||||||||||||
| Climate Vulnerability... | Climate Vulnerability Assessment High Rainfall Zone Grazing System Data |